ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Sergey Yurievich Shokarev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

THE VERIGIN VOLKONSKY BROTHERS AND THE PRACTICE OF POLYNOMY DURING THE TIME OF TROUBLES

For citation
Shokarev, S. Yu. (2025). The Verigin Volkonsky Brothers and the Practice of Polynomy during the Time of Troubles. Voprosy onomastiki, 22(2), 50–75. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2025.22.2.016

Received on 22 September 2024
Accepted on 5 February 2025

Abstract: This article examines the cultural phenomenon of bearing multiple Christian names (polynomy) through the case of the Verigin branch of the Volkonsky family, participants in the events of the Time of Troubles (1598–1613). The founder of this line was Prince Petr Vasilyevich Volkonsky, nicknamed Veriga, who lived in the first half of the 16th century. In the family of his grandson, Prince Fedor Yurievich Verigin Volkonsky, the use of dual Christian names was common. His wife and six sons all had both baptismal and public names. One of these names (Bogdan) does not appear in the church calendar. Two of the sons, Princes Bogdan (baptized Aristarkh) and Grigory (baptized Filimon), became monks under the names Avraamy and Feoktist after being fatally wounded. Another, Prince Peter (son of Bogdan), is also thought to have taken the monastic name Joseph under similar circumstances. The reconstruction of these names is based primarily on an inscription on a chalice donated in 1641/1642 to the Church of St John the Forerunner Monastery in Tula by their sister, the noblewoman Uliana Golovina, as well as entries in synodic and memorial books. Apart from one genealogical record noting the dual name Bogdan (Aristarkh), genealogical and service lists do not contain further evidence of dual naming for the brothers. Calendar analysis of saints’ feast days helps clarify some naming patterns in the family, although in many cases multiple possibilities make this difficult. The widespread use of dual names among the brothers raises broader questions about the popularity of polynomy and how it can be studied statistically. It is suggested that synodic records could offer a more complete picture of polynomic naming practices within this family during the 16th and 17th centuries.

Keywords: anthroponymy; polynomy; Moscow Russia; Time of Troubles; monasticism; Princes Verigin Volkonsky

Acknowledgements

This article was written as part of the state research programme of the RANEPA.

The author expresses sincere thanks to Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Fjodor B. Uspenskij and Dr. Andrey V. Deduk for their assistance, valuable comments, and the materials they provided.

References

Barsukov, A. P. (1883). Rod Sheremetevykh [The Sheremetyev Family] (Vol. 3). St Petersburg: Tip. M. M. Stasiulevicha.

Bogoyavlensky, S. K. (2006). Moskovskii prikaznyi apparat i deloproizvodstvo XVI–XVII vekov [The Moscow Chancery Apparatus and Bureaucratic Practice in the 16th–17th Centuries]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury.

Deduk, A. V., & Shekov, A. V. (2021). Bor’ba kniazei Volkonskikh za rodovye zemli v pervoi polovine XVII v. [The Volkonsky Princes’ Struggle for Ancestral Lands in the First Half of the 17th Century]. Drevniaia Rus’: Voprosy medievistiki, 2, 79–90.

Golubinsky, E. E. (1903). Istoriia kanonizatsii sviatykh v Russkoi Tserkvi [The History of the Canonisation of Saints in the Russian Church]. Moscow: Univ. tip.

Kazansky, P. S. (1847). Rodoslovnaia Golovinykh, vladel’tsev sela Novospasskogo [The Genealogy of the Golovin Family, Owners of the Village Novospasskoe]. Moscow: S. Selivanovsky Press.

Khoruzhenko, O. I. (2012). Rodoslovie kak konstruktsiia rodovoi pamiati: tekstologiia rodoslovnykh rospisei kniazei Volkonskikh XVI–XVII vv. [Genealogy as a Structure of Family Memory: The Textology of the Volkonsky Princes’ Genealogical Lists in the 16th–17th Centuries]. Dialog so vremenem, 41, 203–234.

Leontyev, Ya. V. (2017). “Blizhnei priiatel’, boiarin i voevoda”: M. V. Skopin-Shuiskii i ego armiia [“Trusted Companion, Boyar and Military Commander”: M. V. Skopin-Shuisky and His Army]. Moscow: Argamak-Media.

Likhachev, N. P. (1900). Dvoinye imena [Double Names]. Izvestiia Russkogo genealogicheskogo obshchestva, 1(1), 126–128.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2006). Vybor imeni u russkikh kniazei v X–XVI vv.: Dinasticheskaia istoriia skvoz’ prizmu antroponimiki [Name Choice among Russian Princes in the 10th–16th Centuries: Dynastic History through the Lens of Anthroponymy]. Moscow: Indrik.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2018). Kak zvali dumnogo d’iaka Ivana Eleazarovicha Tsypliateva? (Iz istorii imianarecheniia v XVI v.) [What was the Name of the Duma clerk Ivan Eleazarovich Tsyplyatyev? (From the History of Naming in the 16th Century)]. In F. B. Uspenskij et al. (Eds.), “Vertograd mnogotsvetnyi”: sbornik k 80-letiiu B. N. Flori [“The Multicoloured Garden”: Festschrift for B. N. Florya] (pp. 387–396). Moscow: Indrik.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2020a). Kniaz’ Fedor Teliatevskii i ego nebesnye pokroviteli [Prince Fyodor Telyatyevsky and His Celestial Patrons]. In B. A. Uspenskij, & F. B. Uspenskij (Eds.), Fakty i znaki: Issledovaniia po semiotike istorii [Facts and Signs: Studies in the Semiotics of History] (Iss. 4, pp. 248–270). Moscow: Neolit.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2020b). “Se iaz rab Bozhii…” Mnogoimennost’ kak faktor i fakt drevnerusskoi kul’tury [“Behold, I Am a Servant of God…”: Multi-Namedness as a Factor and Feature of Old Russian Culture]. St Petersburg: Evraziia.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2021a). Antroponimicheskoe voploshchenie semeinogo edinstva v Srednevekovoi Rusi [Anthroponymic Expression of Family Unity in Medieval Rus’]. Russkaia rech’, 6, 77–99. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170017981-8

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2021b). Dva imeni gosudaria (Potapii Maksimovich Matveev vnuk ili Vasilii Ivanovich Shuiskii) [Two Names of the Tsar (Potapii Maksimovich Matveyev, grandson, or Vasili Ivanovich Shuisky)]. In O. I. Togoeva, & O. S. Voskoboynikov (Eds.), Anatomiia vlasti: Gosudari i poddannye v Evrope v Srednie veka i Novoe vremia [An Anatomy of Power: Sovereigns and Subjects in Europe in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Period] (pp. 122–134). Moscow: HSE University Publishing House.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2022). Godunov v krugu rodni: Biograficheskie razyskaniia [Godunov among His Kin: Biographical Investigations]. St Petersburg: Evraziia.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2023a). Kak vybiralos’ imia Vladimir na Rusi XVI v.? (K utochneniiu “antroponimicheskogo dos’e” okol’nichego Golovina) [How Was the Name Vladimir Chosen in 16th Century Rus’? Toward a Clarification of the “Anthroponymic Dossier” of Okolnichy Golovin]. Vestnik sektora drevnerusskogo iskusstva, 1, 89–94.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2023b). Sverzhenie tsaria Vasiliia Shuiskogo v svete novykh dannykh [The Deposition of Czar Vasili Shuisky in the Light of New Data]. Voprosy onomastiki, 20(3), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.3.033

Loseva, O. V. (2001). Russkie mesiatseslovy XI–XIV vekov [Russian Menologia of the 11th–14th Centuries]. Moscow: Pamiatniki istoricheskoi mysli.

Pavlov, A. P. (2018). Dumnye i komnatnye liudi tsaria Mikhaila Romanova: prosopograficheskoe issledovanie [The Tsar’s Councilors and Chamberlains under Mikhail Romanov: A Prosopographical Study] (Vols. 1–2). St Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin.

Shchepkina, E. N. (1892). Tul’skii uezd v XVII veke: Ego vid i naselenie po pistsovym i perepisnym knigam [The Tula District in the 17th Century: Its Appearance and Population Based on Survey and Census Books]. Moscow. Univ. tip.

Shekov, A. V. (2013). Volkona — gorodskoi tsentr kniazheskogo udela kontsa XIV — XV v. [Volkona — the Administrative Center of the Princely Land in the Late 14th — 15th Centuries]. In I. G. Burtsev (Ed.), Gorod Srednevekov’ia i rannego Novogo vremeni: Arkheologiia, istoriia [The Medieval and Early Modern City: Archaeology and History] (pp. 93–136). Tula: Gos. voen.-ist. i prirodnyi muzei-zapovednik “Kulikovo pole”.

Solovyova, T. B. (2006). K voprosu o dual’nosti lichnykh imen kalendarnogo proiskhozhdeniia v imenovanii liudei v Rossii XVI–XVII vv. [On the Dual Character of Personal Names of Calendar Origin in the 16th–17th Centuries Russia]. In Yu. M. Eskin (Ed.), Pamiati Lukicheva: sbornik statei po istorii i istochnikovedeniiu [In Memory of Lukichev: Collected Articles on History and Source Studies] (pp. 686–696). Moscow: Drevnekhranilishche.

Uspenskij, B. A. (1994). Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works] (Vol. 2). Moscow: Gnozis.

Uspenskij, B. A., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2017). Inocheskie imena na Rusi [Monastic Names in Rus’]. Moscow; St Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.

Volkonskaya, E. G. (1900). Rod kniazei Volkonskikh [The Princely Family of Volkonsky]. St Petersburg: Tip. M. M. Stasiulevicha.